This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.
Posted on September 6, by Robert Will Tutorials and Fundamentals Critical appraisal of scientific literature is a necessary skill for healthcare students. Database searching is a skill in itself, but will not be covered in this blog. Critical appraisal of a journal article is a literary and scientific systematic dissection in an attempt to assign merit to the conclusions of an article.
Ideally, an article will be able to undergo scrutiny and retain its findings as valid. The specific questions used to assess validity change slightly with different study designs Critical appraisal article types. However, in an attempt to provide a generalized checklist, no specific subtype of article has been chosen.
Rather, the 20 questions below should be used as a quick reference to appraise any journal article. Critical appraisal of…the Introduction Does the article attempt to answer the same question as your clinical question? Is the article recently published within 5 years or is it seminal i.
Is the journal peer-reviewed? Do the authors present a hypothesis? Critical appraisal of…the Methods Is the study design valid for your question? Are both inclusion and exclusion criteria described?
Are there methodological protocols i. Do the research methods limit the influence of confounding variables? Are the outcome measures valid for the health condition you are researching?
Are the baseline demographics between groups similar? Are the subjects generalizable to your patient? Are the statistical tests appropriate for the study design and clinical question?
Are the results presented within the paper? Are the results statistically significant and how large is the difference between groups? Is there evidence of significance fishing i.
Do the authors acknowledge limitations in the article? Are there any conflicts of interests noted? This is by no means a comprehensive checklist of how to critically appraise a scientific journal article.
However, by answering the previous 20 questions based on a detailed reading of an article, you can appraise most articles for their merit, and thus determine whether the results are valid. I have attempted to list the questions based on the sections most commonly present in a journal article, starting at the introduction and progressing to the conclusion.
I believe some of these items are weighted heavier than others i. However, without taking this list through rigorous testing, I cannot assign a weight to them. Maybe one day, you will be able to critically appraise my future paper: The image in this blog has been retrieved from clipartfreecollection.
He has several areas of interest, including biomechanics, manual physical therapy, exercise prescription, and assistive devices. He is a Colorado native who returned to school after stints in several non-healthcare related fields.
He believes evidence-based medicine will make everyone a better clinician. He lives in Denver, Colorado and enjoys all the state has to offer, other than skiing, because he is a rebel and refuses to fall into that Colorado stereotype.Critical appraisal is a systematic process used to identify the strengths and weaknesses of a research article in order to assess the usefulness and validity of research findings.
Critical appraisal is the process of carefully and systematically assessing the outcome of scientific research (evidence) to judge its trustworthiness, value and relevance in a particular context. Critical appraisal looks at the way a study is conducted and examines factors such as internal validity, generalizability and relevance.
Critical appraisal is integral to the process of Evidence Based Practice. Critical appraisal aims to identify potential threats to the validity of the research findings from the literature and provide consumers of research evidence the opportunity to make informed decisions about the quality of research evidence.
With a large output of medical literature coming out every year, it is impossible for readers to read every article. Critical appraisal of scientific literature is an important skill to be mastered not only by academic medical professionals but also by those involved in clinical practice.
Critical Appraisal of a Controlled Study Appraisal questions Yes Can’t tell No 1. Did the study address a clearly focused question / issue? 2. Is the research method (study design) appropriate for. Critical appraisal skills enable you to systematically assess the trustworthiness, relevance and results of published papers.
The Critical Appraisals Skills Programme (CASP) has over 25 years of significant and unrivalled expertise in the delivery of training to healthcare professionals.