Students engaged in peer editing trade drafts of material they have written and provide each other with suggestions for improvement.
At our company, we technical communicators and some QA analysts all collaborate on Release Notes for our product. Our language edit is one of two editing passes: The language edit ensures clear and correct language, including grammar, usage, and style guide compliance, in unambiguous, internationally comprehensible English within each topic.
The substantive edit, the second pass, focuses on the structural integrity and usefulness of topics as well as the relationship between topics. Even before the editing passes comes the content review by subject-matter experts who are much better at verifying the actual contents.
I guess the best way to edit is to get a professional editor. Unfortunately, we have neither the time nor the budget to hire one. Here are my overlapping benefits and reasons why I think peer editing is such a good idea.
The benefits of peer editing 1. And it ensures that your style guide works. So I had to figure out how to offer constructive criticism — which I think has made me better and more complete writer.
Depending on your team, you may even find that you can teach each other to some degree.
In the best case, it helps colleagues to grow into a team where people trust each other. Does it work well? Feel free to leave a comment.Peer editing is a great chance to help fellow writers reach their full potential. A good peer editor will focus on how to make a paper better.
Opinions are fine, but they shouldn't be the sole focus of a critique.
There are a few disadvantages of peer reviews. The most important problem with a peer review is the bias of the reviewer.
An excellent paper written by a new or maverick scientist is for example more likely to be rejected, than a poorer paper by an established researcher. Peer reviewing allows a diversity of opinions to be brought to the table, theoretically removing any personal biases and pre-set ideas from the equation.
The peer review process stops a lot of substandard and poor science from reaching publication. Peer feedback, which is referred to under different names such as peer response, peer review, peer editing, and peer evaluation, can be defined as "use of learners as sources of information and interactants for each other is such a way that learners assume roles and responsibilities.
Jun 30, · Peer editing is the second best thing to hiring a professional editor and brings additional benefits to your tech comm team. At our company, we technical communicators and some QA analysts all collaborate on Release Notes for our product.
Peer editing has its advantages and disadvantages to be sure, BUT the major advantage(s) are it's FREE; you do so in kind for those who are nice enough to edit your work; it creates a sort of author kinship; and it gives the advantage of more than one set of eyes and objectivity when reading your work.